Skip to main content

Kohlberg TIPR

At which of Kohlberg's levels of moral development are the students in your class functioning? Cite specific evidence and explain your reasoning for selecting these levels. What did the teacher do, or what might be done, to help the students advance to higher levels with regard to the examples you supplied aboveBe sure to underline the concept's vocabulary in your response. (Use your study guide as you go!)

I think most of the students I'm observing fall into convention level of moral development. Most of them seem to really want the approval of the teacher and other students. A lot of them are the class clowns or "teacher's pet" during the class activities. They're participating and not causing problems, but they're definitely doing it for the approval of others. Some of them still demonstrate some instrumental orientation. One student was caught cheating and his justification was that the material was too hard--he thought it was unreasonable to expect him to know the content and so his cheating wasn't wrong to him. 

I haven't seen anyone demonstrate post conventional moral development yet. However, I have heard a few discussion topics that make me think they might be ready to read arguments by people of that level of development. History is a fun subject to see the development of morality because, to some degree, history itself is the story of how humanity has developed new and progressive morals over time. Certainly the general consensus on moral behavior, like enacting slave codes, was significantly different in the early 1800s than it was in 1963. When I spoke to my cooperating teacher about this she said that she's had a handful or two of students who have developed substantial post conventional moral thought processes as juniors or seniors. These were often the kids who scored exceptionally high on her AP tests. She said she's had a lot more who can discuss these issues and begin the thought process with some help and guidance--so long as she frames the question in a way they understand, offers context, explanation, etc. But she said a good portion of the students can't reach this level even with substantial help or prodding. She tries to offer a lot of questions about moral dilemmas in order to give the students a chance to reflect on their own thought processes and experiences. She also has students share their thoughts when they're comfortable doing so, as hearing differing opinions and reasonings seem to help some of the students learn how to get to a higher level of thinking, and even possibly a higher level of moral development. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lesson Reflection

My lesson did help with the students metacognitive skills, but in the future, I'd focus more on it. I think I should have helped the students make more of a metacognitive connection. I did review the daily objective with the students, but in hindsight, I think I would have put more emphasis on it throughout the lesson--to connect the students' analysis and learning to what I had written on the board. I think that would have helped them understand how to use the tools the teacher provides, like objectives and focus attention words , (from Info Processing Unit). I could have helped them monitor their own learning by using co-regulation and shared-regulation strategies. I would have them ask their groups and peers if they could answer the "objective" question. There were a few students who felt overwhelmed with the secondary sources. Although these sources were at an appropriate level for most  students, a few that struggle with reading needed some help. I could have ...

Social Cognitivism TIPR

How does the teacher use modeling/observational learning? Include factors that impact learning from models in your response (attention, retention, production, motivation/reinforcement) as well as the types (live/symbolic) and characteristics (competence, power/prestige, etc.) of models used. Cite specific examples and be sure to include  underlined vocabulary  from the theory in your response. My cooprating teacher uses modeling as an effective method for classroom management. I think one of her strengths is her classroom management skills (I actually observe a couple teachers depending on which day I'm at the school, and this particular teacher has the best control of the classroom. She's very good at reinforcing positive behaviors whenever possible, which I believe has a response facilitation effect . She has a lot of class discussions that could easily become chaotic if she wasn't able to keep the students speaking in turn. She recognizes students for following the ru...

Student Development Profile

Cognitive Development One thing that I've recognized regarding the student's cognitive development is that they still need a fair amount of help in organizing new information into schemata , as Piaget explained. Often times all the information they need is there in their brains! They've learned it all, they've even retained most of it. However, they don't connect the dots until the teacher really helps them assimilate information. I've also noticed that there does seem to be a connection between readiness, or maturation , and development . There are some students that have a difficult time understanding some of the more complex issues or applications regardless of how much the teacher tries to help them. Sometimes I can tell just by listening to their thought processes that it might be a maturation issue. One other thing I've really noticed is that sometimes students in  disequilibrium  are easy to recognize, but often times they're not. There were ...