My lesson did help with the students metacognitive skills, but in the future, I'd focus more on it. I think I should have helped the students make more of a metacognitive connection. I did review the daily objective with the students, but in hindsight, I think I would have put more emphasis on it throughout the lesson--to connect the students' analysis and learning to what I had written on the board. I think that would have helped them understand how to use the tools the teacher provides, like objectives and focus attention words , (from Info Processing Unit). I could have helped them monitor their own learning by using co-regulation and shared-regulation strategies. I would have them ask their groups and peers if they could answer the "objective" question. There were a few students who felt overwhelmed with the secondary sources. Although these sources were at an appropriate level for most students, a few that struggle with reading needed some help. I could have
Identify the learning theory (modern constructivism, information processing, social learning theory, behaviorism) that will most heavily influence your lesson (or most heavily influenced your lesson looking back). Use and underline vocabulary from the theory to describe how you plan to implement the theory in your lesson (or how you implemented the theory in your lesson looking back), providing specific examples for each term used. Cite research written by key theorists (e.g. Vygotsky, Bruner, Dewey, Bandura, Atkins & Shiffrin, Skinner, etc.) in these areas to justify your plan. Constructivism is the learning theory that most influenced my unit lesson. I used guided discovery and a complex learning environment ( problem-based learning and cooperative learning) to facilitate the learning process. Rather than lecturing, I posed the question about how the Founding Fathers could unite the north and the south with a new government. "How would the Founding Fathers solve